On Sun, 10 Jul 2011 14:56:19 +0300, Pekka Enberg <penberg@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > There's no mention that the i915 developers know about this problem so > I'm CC'ing Keith and Chris. Thanks. I've added a comment to the bug: First off, of course you are encouraged to re-test with 3.0-rc6 just to make sure it hasn't changed in some way. I don't think anything has changed enough to affect this, but it's always good to be sure. I note a long sequence of patches that are supposed to help with the U160: 448f53a1ede54eb854d036abf54573281412d650 drm/i915/bios: Reverse order of 100/120 Mhz SSC clocks bcfbbce822d219eb587acaba8a6e062bbeae4761 Revert "drm/i915/bios: Reverse order of 100/120 Mhz SSC clocks" a76150302d6e7ebc43e1a1ddaee7fd51db8da3b3 drm/i915: Add a module option to override the use of SSC I'm not sure why a quirk wasn't added for this hardware; it's clearly 'non-standard' in some mystic way. -- keith.packard@xxxxxxxxx
Attachment:
pgpaTwtEkY6ha.pgp
Description: PGP signature
