On 10-11-18 06:50 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
This message contains a list of some post-2.6.35 regressions introduced before
2.6.36, for which there are no fixes in the mainline known to the tracking team.
If any of them have been fixed already, please let us know.
If you know of any other unresolved post-2.6.35 regressions, please let us know
either and we'll add them to the list. Also, please let us know if any
of the entries below are invalid.
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21652
Subject : several problems with intel graphics since 2.6.36
Submitter : Norbert Preining<preining@xxxxxxxx>
Date : 2010-10-27 14:32 (23 days old)
Message-ID :<20101027143252.GA8676@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128818998630241&w=2
That one is interesting to me.. I suspect it may be the same cause
as for https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21952
I have one of those Samsung (N210) Netbooks here: works fine with 2.6.34 and
earlier,
but fails to come out of suspend on 2.6.35/2.6.36 (haven't tried 2.6.37).
So perhaps add 21952 to the list, or link it to the 21652
(kind of amusing how similar the bug numbers are..).
My non-Intel graphics notebook (has ATI X1400 graphics) also has a resume
regression with 2.6.36. But it does work fine with 2.6.35 (and earlier,
back many years). As a result, I'm stuck with 2.6.35 for the time being,
and lack the time for a concerted debug effort on 2.6.36+ right now.
Cheers
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-testers" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
