On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 06:28:29AM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 12:40:59AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Monday, October 04, 2010, Anisse Astier wrote: > > > Also this patch is new and didn't see much testing (I tested on 4 > > > different Intel GPUs, belonging only to 2 different families); if it's > > > not merged for 2.6.36, it won't be for 2.6.37 (the new code will land > > > first). If that happens, it might not meet conditions to be accepted > > > in -stable (being in linus' tree first). > > > > It's a panic fix, so I think it is -stable material anyway. Greg? > > That sounds good, please cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxx with the proper > information for this (git commit id, patch info, etc.) I'll do that as soon as drm-intel-next has hit -linus. I've written the original fix and marked it cc: stable so it won't get lost. I've been rather cautious with pushing this because it's the 3rd trial to fix a bug in late .35-rc. The previous fixes already caused regressions in -stable and I'd simply like to avoid causing yet another regression over the same problem. Yours, Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Mail: daniel@xxxxxxxx Mobile: +41 (0)79 365 57 48 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-testers" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
