On Sat, 2 Oct 2010 23:58:35 +0200 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On Saturday, October 02, 2010, Ted Ts'o wrote: > > On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 10:04:15PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > > from 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team > > > know (either way). > > > > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19062 > > > Subject : Dirtiable inode bdi default != sb bdi btrfs > > > Submitter : Cesar Eduardo Barros <cesarb@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > Date : 2010-09-23 0:54 (4 days old) > > > Message-ID : <4C9AA546.6050201@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128520328929595&w=2 > > > > Note: I'm seeing this warning (Dirtiable inode bdi default != sb bdi) > > when I moved from 2.6.36-rc3 to 2.6.36-rc6, using ext4 as a root > > partition, and running mke2fs and e2fsck on ext2, ext3, and ext4 file > > systems. So I'm seeing this as a known regression from rc3 to rc6. > > Maybe it's different bug with ext4, but in any case, it's highly > > annoying. > > Thanks for the info. I wonder who should see this report. > > Andrew, do you know whose area that is? Christoph had a patch, and Jan had another patch. Maybe commit 692ebd17c2905313fff3c504c249c6a0faad16ec Author: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx> Date: Tue Sep 21 11:51:01 2010 +0200 bdi: Fix warnings in __mark_inode_dirty for /dev/zero and friends already fixed this? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-testers" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
