On Mon, 2010-08-30 at 01:13 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should > be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16399 > Subject : perf failed with kernel 2.6.35-rc > Submitter : Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Date : 2010-07-13 8:14 (48 days old) > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/1ac62cfff252fb668405ef3398a1fa7f4a0d6d15 > Message-ID : <1279008849.2096.913.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127900880212470&w=2 > > Should be fixed by: commit 351af0725e5222e35741011d1ea62215c1ed06db Author: Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri Aug 6 13:39:08 2010 +0800 perf, x86: Fix Intel-nhm PMU programming errata workaround Fix the Errata AAK100/AAP53/BD53 workaround, the officialy documented workaround we implemented in: 11164cd: perf, x86: Add Nehelem PMU programming errata workaround doesn't actually work fully and causes a stuck PMU state under load and non-functioning perf profiling. A functional workaround was found by trial & error. Affects all Nehalem-class Intel PMUs. Signed-off-by: Zhang Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx> LKML-Reference: <1281073148.2125.63.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx> Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxx> # .35.x Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-testers" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
