On Wed, 16 Jun 2010 23:00:37 +0200 Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 10:42 PM, Andrew Morton > <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, 9 Jun 2010 11:22:35 +0200 > > "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >> On Wednesday 09 June 2010, Sedat Dilek wrote: > >> > The patch from [1] is still missing. > >> > > >> > __ __"cpufreq-call-nr_iowait_cpu-with-disabled-preemption.patch" from > >> > Dmitry Monakhoc > >> > > >> > Tested-by: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx> > >> > Tested-by Maciej Rutecki <maciej.rutecki@xxxxxxxxx> > >> > > >> > I have already reported this issue on LKML [2] and cpufreq ML [3]. > >> > > >> > - Sedat - > >> > > >> > [1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/cpufreq/msg01631.html > >> > [2] http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/5/31/77 > >> > [3] http://www.spinics.net/lists/cpufreq/msg01637.html > >> > >> Thanks, added. > > > > I just merged a different patch whcih should address this: > > How do cpu-freq related stuff find its way into mainline? > Is there a GIT repository/branch on <git.kernel.org> where you can pull from? > (top-posting repaired. Please don't) Usually via the cpufreq git tree, mailing list and maintainer, as described in ./MAINTAINERS. But for a patch like this one, I'll just scoot it into mainline unless Dave happens to grab it before I do that. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-testers" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
