On Wednesday 21 April 2010, Michael Ellerman wrote: > On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 18:55 +0300, Alexey Dobriyan wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 10:18:18PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote: > > > On Mon, 2010-04-19 at 23:45 -0700, Christian Kujau wrote: > > > --- a/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c > > > +++ b/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c > > > @@ -175,6 +175,24 @@ retry: > > > return fixed_name; > > > } > > > > > > +static const char *unslash_name(const char *name) > > > +{ > > > + char *p, *fixed_name; > > > + > > > + fixed_name = kstrdup(name); > > > + if (!fixed_name) { > > > + printk(KERN_ERR "device-tree: Out of memory trying to unslash " > > > + "name \"%s\"\n", name); > > > + return name; > > > + } > > > + > > > + p = fixed_name; > > > + while ((p = strstr(p, "/"))) > > > + *p++ = '_'; > > > > This is wasteful. :-) > > Whatever, patches welcome :) > > > Also, I hope we won't spit message every time allocation fail. > > We do. Your system is mostly hosed anyway, but feel free to rate limit > it or something. OK Is anyone going to post a clean patch for that with a sign-off? Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-testers" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html