On Monday 15 February 2010, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx> writes: > > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report > > of recent regressions. > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > from 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team > > know (either way). > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14999 > > Subject : possible circular locking dependency detected in rfkill at suspend > > Submitter : Christian Casteyde <casteyde.christian@xxxxxxx> > > Date : 2010-01-06 21:52 (40 days old) > > I have a set of patches to clear up the sysfs lockdep false positives. > http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/2/11/329 > > It requires sprinking a bunch of sysfs_attr_init on the few dynamically > allocated sysfs attributes, and I haven't found them all yet. Otherwise > it seems to be working well. > > Greg should pick up those patches shortly and they should be appearing > in linux-next and then ultimately in 2.6.34. Great, I'm glad that these issues are being worked on. Thanks for the information. Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-testers" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
