On Wed, 27 Jan 2010, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > Without intel_bus.c, we essentially assume config 1 all the time. > If we keep intel_bus.c and this patch for .33, things should work > for configs 1 and 4. Adding support for config 4 is good. Quite frankly, is there any major downside to just disabling/removing intel_bus.c for 2.6.33? If we're not planning on having it in the long run anyway - or even if we are, but we can't be really happy about the state of it as it would be in 2.6.33, not using it at all seems to be the smaller headache. The machines that it helps are also the machines where you can fix things up with 'use_csr', no? And they are pretty rare, and they didn't use to work without that use_csr in 2.6.32 either, so it's not even a regression. Am I missing something? Linus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-testers" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
