* Pekka Enberg <penberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > (I am CC'ing some more perf folks.) > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 12:22 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > > of regressions introduced between 2.6.31 and 2.6.32. > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > introduced between 2.6.31 and 2.6.32. ?Please verify if it still should > > be listed and let me know (either way). > > > > Bug-Entry ? ? ? : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14657 > > Subject ? ? ? ? : perf subsystem breakage in 2.6.32-rc7 > > Submitter ? ? ? : Arjan van de Ven <arjan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Date ? ? ? ? ? ?: 2009-11-19 19:50 (67 days old) > > References ? ? ?: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125866013419738&w=4 > > Is this bug still valid? Ought to be fixed by: 8f06d7e: perf timechart: Use tid not pid for COMM change But i'd like Arjan to confirm this before we can strike this from the list of regressions. Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-testers" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
