Re: [Bug #15132] OOPS's with large initramfs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Verified. I have tested this as far back as 2.6.30 with the same problem
with "very" large initramfs's.

> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.32.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15132
> Subject		: OOPS's with large initramfs
> Submitter	: Nigel Kukard <nkukard@xxxxxxxx>
> Date		: 2010-01-16 11:12 (9 days old)
> References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126364100321603&w=4
>
>
>   


-- 
Regards
Nigel Kukard, PhD CompSc
Linux Based Systems Design (Pty) Ltd

Support: 086 747 7600 (premium 24/7/365)
Fax: 086 601 7884

Quote: The best language to use is the language that was designed for
what you want to use it for.

*** The attachment to my email signature.asc is a digital PGP
signature, if your mail client supports digital signatures it will
allow you to verify I am the sender of this email and that it has not
been tampered with along the way ***


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux