On Monday 11 January 2010, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > On Sun, 10 Jan 2010 23:56:13 +0100 (CET) > "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > > of regressions introduced between 2.6.31 and 2.6.32. > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > introduced between 2.6.31 and 2.6.32. Please verify if it still > > should be listed and let me know (either way). > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14657 > > Subject : perf subsystem breakage in 2.6.32-rc7 > > Submitter : Arjan van de Ven <arjan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Date : 2009-11-19 19:50 (53 days old) > > References : > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125866013419738&w=4 > > > patch available in the bugzilla, and also in > http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/71962/ That's in http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15040 . Are they the same bug in fact? Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-testers" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
