On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 11:50:21 +0100 Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 11:48 +0100, Kristoffer Ericson wrote: > > On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 11:33:45 +0100 > > Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 10:54 +0100, Kristoffer Ericson wrote: > > > > > > > > > > + hw->wiphy->ps_default = false; > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > I tried the patch last night as I said, thought that it was working. But not long after > > > > sending that email I started seeing those disassociations again (that not appear at all in 2.6.30). > > > > So doesnt seem like it was due to that after all. :( > > > > > > But then how reliable is your bisect result? The effect of the patch in > > > question would've been completely disabled by this line. > > > > Will have to ask Justin about that. > > Oh, sorry. Maybe you're just running into different bugs that have the > same visible effect? Its quite possible I guess. I will do an bisect and see if I can get anymore output. > > johannes -- Kristoffer Ericson <kristoffer.ericson@xxxxxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-testers" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
