Re: [PATCH 2/3] page allocator: Do not allow interrupts to use ALLOC_HARDER

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> > I believe it would be better to simply remove it.
> 
> You are against trying to give the realtime tasks a best effort
> advantage at memory allocation?

Yes. Those memory reserves were for kernel, GPF_ATOMIC and stuff. Now
realtime tasks are allowed to eat into them. That feels wrong.

"realtime" tasks are not automatically "more important".

> Realtime apps often *have* to allocate memory on the kernel side,
> because they use network system calls, etc...

So what? As soon as they do that, they lose any guarantees, anyway.
									Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-testers" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux