On Saturday 31 October 2009, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Sat, 31 Oct 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > Yes, there is, because socket_early_resume() only does it in > > the (skt->state & SOCKET_PRESENT) case. If that bit is not set, the > > initialization is entirely postponed. > > Ahh, ok. And what's the reason for that? It seems like the > > skt->socket = dead_socket; > skt->ops->init(skt); > skt->ops->set_socket(skt, &skt->socket); > > thing should always be safe, whether there is something present or not.. ? It should, but I'm not sure given the reported behavior so far. I guess I'll prepare another patch that does this unconditionally in the early phase and let's see how that works. Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-testers" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
