On Saturday 31 October 2009, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Fri, 2009-10-30 at 12:47 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > > On Fri, 30 Oct 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > > > > > > 1) Resume works if pcmcia_socket_dev_resume(dev) is moved to the "regular" > > > resume phase, after resume_device_irqs(). > > > > Hmm. We really probably shouldn't call pcmcia_socket_dev_resume() in > > early_resume. It takes mutexes etc, and it calls "socket_resume()", which > > sleeps etc. That per se should be ok these days (since we don't actualyl > > disable CPU irq's, just device irqs), but it also does that whole card > > insertion events etc. And _that_ code I wouldn't trust at all. > > > > The PCMCIA code is better than it used to be a long time ago, but some of > > it is still pretty crazy. > > > > I get the feeling that we should just revert that commit 0c570cdeb, and > > instead always do PCMCIA suspend as a "eject" event. That way we have no > > driver behind it to resume at resume time - and we'll see any plugged-in > > device as just a new insertion. > > To me the proper approach would be to split it so that Well, agreed, but ... > - early_resume() restores power & config space etc... so that existing > devices can move on (might check for removal). There's no other hotplug > activity ... that's exactly what doesn't work at the moment. Thanks, Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-testers" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
