Re: [PATCH 0/5] Candidate fix for increased number of GFP_ATOMIC failures V2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Mel Gorman schrieb am Donnerstag, den 22. Oktober um 16:22 Uhr:

> [No BZ ID] Kernel crash on 2.6.31.x (kcryptd: page allocation failure..)
> 	This apparently is easily reproducible, particular in comparison to
> 	the other reports. The point of greatest interest is that this is
> 	order-0 GFP_ATOMIC failures. Sven, I'm hoping that you in particular
> 	will be able to follow the tests below as you are the most likely
> 	person to have an easily reproducible situation.

I will see what I can do on the weekend. Unfortunately the crash happens on
a somewhat important machine and afterwards the Software-RAID needs a resync
which takes a few hours.

Sven

-- 
"Those who do not understand Unix are condemned to reinvent it, poorly"
(Henry Spencer)

/me is giggls@ircnet, http://sven.gegg.us/ on the Web
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-testers" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux