On Tuesday 06 October 2009, David Rientjes wrote: > On Mon, 5 Oct 2009, Frans Pop wrote: > > And the winner is: > > 2ff05b2b4eac2e63d345fc731ea151a060247f53 is first bad commit > > commit 2ff05b2b4eac2e63d345fc731ea151a060247f53 > > Author: David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Date: Tue Jun 16 15:32:56 2009 -0700 > > > > oom: move oom_adj value from task_struct to mm_struct > > > > I'm confident that the bisection is good. The test case was very > > reliable while zooming in on the merge from akpm. > > I doubt it for two reasons: (i) this commit was reverted in 0753ba0 > since 2.6.31-rc7 and is no longer in the kernel, and (ii) these are > GFP_ATOMIC allocations which would be unaffected by oom killer scores. OK. Looks like I have been getting some false "good" results. I've been redoing part of the bisect and am getting close to a new candidate. Will explain further when I have that. Cheers, FJP -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-testers" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
