On Wed, 16 Sep 2009, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 04:45:37PM -0700, David Rientjes wrote: > > On Thu, 10 Sep 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > > > So I did a biset, and this is the result: > > > > $ git bisect good > > > > 0e64a0c982c06a6b8f5e2a7f29eb108fdf257b2f is first bad commit > > > > 0e64a0c has this cleanup, which isn't equivalent to the previous code: > > Please look at the patch I attached to the bug report. There is > other code that is not equivalent. It's in comment #17: > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13780#c17 > > And the patch itself: > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=23048 > > This patch fixes my problem. > Ah, I hadn't noticed you attached a patch there that fixes the issue for you. Is it en-route to Dave Jones so that it can make its way upstream? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-testers" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
