[Rafael J. Wysocki - Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 05:04:06PM +0200] | On Thursday 20 August 2009, Martin-Éric Racine wrote: | > Yes, it's still valid. | | Thanks for the update. | | > Screenshots of the crash have been provided. Is anything else missing | > for the LKML to be able to debug and fix this? | | An idea of what can be wrong? | | > On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 11:26 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki<rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote: | > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report | > > of recent regressions. | > > | > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions | > > from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know | > > (either way). | > > | > > | > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13941 | > > Subject : x86 Geode issue | > > Submitter : Martin-Éric Racine <q-funk@xxxxxx> | > > Date : 2009-08-03 12:58 (17 days old) | > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124930434732481&w=4 | | Rafael | Hi, may I post a thought? It seems strange to me that alloc_inode may set #ifdef CONFIG_FS_POSIX_ACL inode->i_acl = inode->i_default_acl = ACL_NOT_CACHED; #endif [where ACL_NOT_CACHED is #define ACL_NOT_CACHED ((void *)(-1))] meanwhile say jffs2_init_acl_post use ACL_NOT_CACHED as a valid value and trying to parse it. But perhaps, I miss something. -- Cyrill -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-testers" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
