On Mon, 29 Jun 2009 19:28:53 +0300 Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On (06/29/09 15:41), Alan Cox wrote: > > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a > > > report of recent regressions. > > > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known > > > regressions from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be > > > listed and let me know (either way). > > > > Yes although getting people seeing to test with might_sleep() > > checks in the tty layer demonstrate the tty layer isn't calling > > into ppp with irqs disabled when it shouldn't so I'm at a loss as > > to whether this is a network bug, a scheduler bug or something else. > > > > The schedule error in __tasklet_schedule() is itself rather > > peicular. > > > > Hello Alan, Rafael, > > BUG is still here... can you enable CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO, and then run this through scripts/markup_oops.pl ? With a bit of luck it'll point to the exact code that's going wrong... -- Arjan van de Ven Intel Open Source Technology Centre For development, discussion and tips for power savings, visit http://www.lesswatts.org -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-testers" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
