On (06/29/09 15:41), Alan Cox wrote: > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > > of recent regressions. > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know > > (either way). > > Yes although getting people seeing to test with might_sleep() checks in > the tty layer demonstrate the tty layer isn't calling into ppp with irqs > disabled when it shouldn't so I'm at a loss as to whether this is a > network bug, a scheduler bug or something else. Looks like I can't reproduce with rc1-git5 (after several hours)... I'll try -git3,-git4. > > The schedule error in __tasklet_schedule() is itself rather peicular. > Reported : 2009-06-28 22:07 by Rafael J. Wysocki Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13652 Subject : scheduling while atomic: pptpgw Rafael, I'm not sure we need 'scheduling while atomic: pptpgw' bug. Initially BUG 13522 was named "BUG: scheduling while atomic: pptpgw" and renamed to "BUG: scheduling while atomic" since I was not sure wheter this is ppp or scheduler bug... --- kernel: [ 1424.347514] BUG: scheduling while atomic: ksoftirqd/0/4/0x10000500 kernel: [27404.945372] BUG: scheduling while atomic: pptpgw/4637/0x00000400 kernel: [ 1715.273674] BUG: scheduling while atomic: ksoftirqd/0/4/0x10000500 kernel: [ 1631.073371] BUG: scheduling while atomic: pptpgw/3169/0x10000500 ... --- Sergey -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-testers" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
