On Sunday 03 May 2009, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Sun, 3 May 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > Remove the shrinking of memory from the suspend-to-RAM code, where it is > > not really necessary. > > Hmm. Shouldn't we do this _regardless_? > > IOW, shouldn't this be a totally separate patch? It seems to be left-over > from when we shared the same code-paths, and before the split of the STR > and hibernate code? > > IOW, shouldn't the very _first_ patch just be this part? That code doesn't > make any sense anyway (that FREE_PAGE_NUMBER really _is_ totally > arbitrary). > > This part seems to be totally independent of all the other parts in your > patch-series. No? I'm removing this along with shrink_all_memory() which it depends on, but I can put that into a separate patch if you prefer. Thanks, Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-testers" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
