Re: [Bug #13186] cpufreq timer teardown problem

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Rafael J. Wysocki (rjw@xxxxxxx) wrote:
> On Sunday 26 April 2009, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> > * Rafael J. Wysocki (rjw@xxxxxxx) wrote:
> > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > > of regressions introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29.
> > > 
> > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > > introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29.  Please verify if it still should
> > > be listed and let me know (either way).
> > > 
> > 
> > I've had no news that the patches I proposed has been considered for
> > -stable. They fix the teardown problem here. So I guess it's better to
> > wait for the patches to get into -stable before we close this bug ?
> 
> In fact the bug is closeable as soon as they are in the Linus' tree.  Are they
> in it right now?
> 

Nope, Andrew pulled the conservative governor fix for 2.6.30-rc in his
tree, but that's about it.

The fixes for ondemand 2.6.28, 2.6.29 and 2.6.30-rc have not been pulled
yet. The fix for conservative 2.6.28, 2.6.29 has not been pulled
neither.

Mathieu

> Thanks,
> Rafael

-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers
OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F  BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-testers" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux