Re: [Bug #13058] First hibernation attempt fails

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi!

> Of course, this will protect the calling task from getting oom-killed. 
> But it doesn't protect other tasks from getting oom-killed due to the
> activity of _this_ task.
> 
> But I think that problem already exists, and that this proposal doesn't
> worsen anything, yes?
> 
> Or is it the case that all other tasks are safely stuck in the freezer
> at this time, so they won't be allocating any memory anyway?

That is the idea, yes. ... but we now have more threads that are not
freezable... so they may allocate the memory.

Is it non-feasible to free memory without really going and allocating
everything?

									Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-testers" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux