On Fri, Apr 17 2009, Jens Axboe wrote: > On Fri, Apr 17 2009, Alan Jenkins wrote: > > Jens Axboe wrote: > > > On Thu, Apr 16 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > > >> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > > >> of recent regressions. > > >> > > >> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > >> from 2.6.29. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know > > >> (either way). > > >> > > >> > > >> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13058 > > >> Subject : First hibernation attempt fails > > >> Submitter : Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > >> Date : 2009-04-10 10:58 (7 days old) > > >> First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=1faa16d22877f4839bd433547d770c676d1d964c > > >> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123928022321917&w=2 > > >> > > > > > > Alan, is this still a problem? > > > > > > > Yup. Still present in v2.6.30-rc2-195-g9f76208. > > Given the somewhat odd nature of the bug and the requirements to trigger > it, how confident are you in the bisection results? > > I'll try and reproduce it here. I can't reproduce it here. It seems very odd that an ENOMEM would happen as a consequence of the rq allocation change, it doesn't really change the allocation at all (and it'll never return -ENOMEM). Can you please recheck the git bisect results. It'd be nice if the hibernation failure would actually log where the problem occured... -- Jens Axboe -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-testers" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
