On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 06:07:27PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > of regressions introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should > be listed and let me know (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12612 > Subject : hard lockup when interrupting cdda2wav > Submitter : Matthias Reichl <hias@xxxxxxxxx> > Date : 2009-01-28 16:41 (53 days old) > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123316111415677&w=4 > Handled-By : FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=123371501613019&w=2 The bug is still present in 2.6.28.9 and in 2.6.29 (see backtraces below). so long, Hias ============================================= [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ] 2.6.28.9-dbg #1 --------------------------------------------- swapper/0 is trying to acquire lock: (&q->__queue_lock){.+..}, at: [<ffffffff8040e3b5>] blk_put_request+0x25/0x60 but task is already holding lock: (&q->__queue_lock){.+..}, at: [<ffffffff8040e29a>] blk_end_io+0x5a/0xa0 other info that might help us debug this: 1 lock held by swapper/0: #0: (&q->__queue_lock){.+..}, at: [<ffffffff8040e29a>] blk_end_io+0x5a/0xa0 stack backtrace: Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.28.9-dbg #1 Call Trace: <IRQ> [<ffffffff8026cd17>] __lock_acquire+0x1797/0x1930 [<ffffffff8026cf4a>] lock_acquire+0x9a/0xe0 [<ffffffff8040e3b5>] blk_put_request+0x25/0x60 [<ffffffff806ab173>] _spin_lock_irqsave+0x43/0x90 [<ffffffff8040e3b5>] blk_put_request+0x25/0x60 [<ffffffff8040e3b5>] blk_put_request+0x25/0x60 [<ffffffff80520644>] sg_finish_rem_req+0xa4/0x100 [<ffffffff80521d98>] sg_rq_end_io+0x278/0x2e0 [<ffffffff8040e041>] end_that_request_last+0x61/0x260 [<ffffffff8040e2a8>] blk_end_io+0x68/0xa0 [<ffffffff80507da1>] scsi_end_request+0x41/0xd0 [<ffffffff80508490>] scsi_io_completion+0x130/0x470 [<ffffffff80413195>] blk_done_softirq+0x75/0x90 [<ffffffff8024890b>] __do_softirq+0x9b/0x180 [<ffffffff80213dd3>] native_sched_clock+0x13/0x70 [<ffffffff8020d6ec>] call_softirq+0x1c/0x30 [<ffffffff8020f175>] do_softirq+0x65/0xa0 [<ffffffff802483a5>] irq_exit+0xa5/0xb0 [<ffffffff8020f467>] do_IRQ+0x107/0x1d0 [<ffffffff8020c7fb>] ret_from_intr+0x0/0xf <EOI> [<ffffffff80214b86>] mwait_idle+0x56/0x60 [<ffffffff80214b7d>] mwait_idle+0x4d/0x60 [<ffffffff8020b353>] cpu_idle+0x63/0xc0 ============================================= [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ] 2.6.29-dbg #1 --------------------------------------------- swapper/0 is trying to acquire lock: (&q->__queue_lock){.+..}, at: [<ffffffff8041a8c5>] blk_put_request+0x25/0x60 but task is already holding lock: (&q->__queue_lock){.+..}, at: [<ffffffff8041a7aa>] blk_end_io+0x5a/0xa0 other info that might help us debug this: 1 lock held by swapper/0: #0: (&q->__queue_lock){.+..}, at: [<ffffffff8041a7aa>] blk_end_io+0x5a/0xa0 stack backtrace: Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.29-dbg #1 Call Trace: <IRQ> [<ffffffff8027109a>] __lock_acquire+0xfda/0x1b70 [<ffffffff806c1c89>] error_exit+0x29/0xb0 [<ffffffff80531e30>] sg_rq_end_io+0x0/0x2e0 [<ffffffff806c4392>] bad_to_user+0xac/0x5c4 [<ffffffff80271cca>] lock_acquire+0x9a/0xe0 [<ffffffff8041a8c5>] blk_put_request+0x25/0x60 [<ffffffff806c1423>] _spin_lock_irqsave+0x43/0x90 [<ffffffff8041a8c5>] blk_put_request+0x25/0x60 [<ffffffff8041a8c5>] blk_put_request+0x25/0x60 [<ffffffff80530934>] sg_finish_rem_req+0xa4/0x100 [<ffffffff805320a8>] sg_rq_end_io+0x278/0x2e0 [<ffffffff8041a52a>] end_that_request_last+0x5a/0x280 [<ffffffff8041a7b8>] blk_end_io+0x68/0xa0 [<ffffffff805186e6>] scsi_io_completion+0x146/0x520 [<ffffffff8041fa65>] blk_done_softirq+0x75/0x90 [<ffffffff8024bcbb>] __do_softirq+0x9b/0x180 [<ffffffff8020d5fc>] call_softirq+0x1c/0x30 [<ffffffff8020f145>] do_softirq+0x65/0xb0 [<ffffffff8024b7e5>] irq_exit+0x85/0xa0 [<ffffffff8020f3e7>] do_IRQ+0xb7/0x1b0 [<ffffffff8020ce53>] ret_from_intr+0x0/0xf <EOI> [<ffffffff80214436>] mwait_idle+0x86/0x90 [<ffffffff8021442d>] mwait_idle+0x7d/0x90 [<ffffffff8020b417>] cpu_idle+0x67/0xc0 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-testers" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
