On Thursday 19 March 2009, Johannes Berg wrote: > Wext is a mess, and we've known that for a long time... But no, the > sequence should _not_ be required, it's just _easier_ for the kernel, > and as such has a better probability of succeeding if there are > problems, it should still work though. > > However, one thing that will _not_ work is this: > iwconfig wlan0 essid xyz > iwconfig wlan0 key s:xyz > > you still need: > iwconfig wlan0 ap any > > or anything similar after setting the key to trigger the kernel to do > something. OK. Thanks for the info. > > Reason I ask is that for example when writing wireless support for > > e.g. a distro installation system, it seems most logical to *first* > > ask the user what network (ESSID) he wants to connect to. Next to > > check if we can connect to that network without additional > > authentication and only then, if needed, ask for keys etc. > > If it's not possible to set that info in that logical order that > > seems rather restrictive to me and would probably mean that you'd > > have to reset AP, ESSID and possibly other settings before each > > incremental attempt. > > That's a pretty wrong argument, nothing says your software cannot > collect all the information and then give it to the kernel at once > later, I think... In fact, this is required anyway when you use RSN or > WPA (wpa_supplicant needs all information at once), for example. Well, the thing is that we'll already have tried just setting essid to check if it's an open network. However, I can see the point of needing to set the essid _again_ after asking the key info and setting that. I can also see how you might have to unset some settings in some cases, for example if the NIC has already associated with the wrong network (e.g. because there's a totally open network in range). Our current logic (in Debian Installer) definitely needs improving and these pointers will help. Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-testers" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html