* John W. Linville <linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 10:48:02AM -0400, John W. Linville wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 07:55:49AM +0800, Jeff Chua wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 3:57 AM, Linus Torvalds > > > <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > IOW, if you've pinpointed 71c11fb57b924c160297ccd9e1761db598d00ac2 as > > > > being bad, then you should go back and double-check that its parent > > > > (in this case 4607816f608b42a5379aca97ceed08378804c99f) is good. > > > > Because if it's parent is also bad, then that just means that you made > > > > some mistake in "git bisect". > > > > In this case, it really sounds like maybe you marked the parent good, even > > > > though you should have marked it bad. > > > > > > I should have been more careful, just got thrown off during the last > > > few steps of the bisect. But with the bad association to the AP after > > > a57a59f247b651e8ed6d3eeb7e2f9d83b83134c9 (iwlwifi: remove implicit > > > direct scan), can someone suggest where to go from here? > > > > The obvious question for me is did you try this? > > > > git revert a57a59f247b651e8ed6d3eeb7e2f9d83b83134c9 > > Hmmm...more like this: > > git revert 41bb73eeac5ff5fb217257ba33b654747b3abf11 > git revert b23f99bcfa12c7b452f7ad201ea5921534d4e9ff > git revert 71c11fb57b924c160297ccd9e1761db598d00ac2 > git revert 4607816f608b42a5379aca97ceed08378804c99f > git revert a57a59f247b651e8ed6d3eeb7e2f9d83b83134c9 > > This first one has a conflict -- just take the hunk. Since you apparently have done this sequence and have resolved the conflict (which is hard to do for testers even in trivial cases) - would you mind to post the resulting combo patch for Jeff to test? Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-testers" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
