On Tue, 2009-02-24 at 14:09 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote: > Kevin Shanahan wrote: > > On Mon, 2009-02-23 at 23:03 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > >> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > >> of regressions introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28. > >> > >> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > >> introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should > >> be listed and let me know (either way). > >> > > > > Yes, the problem should still be listed. > > The bug is still present as recently as 2.6.29-rc5-00299-gadfafef. > > > > Did tracing turn anything up? I provided some more traces using Ingo's "tip" branch, but I don't think anyone has looked at them yet. http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12465#c11 I can provide more traces if e.g. a different set of functions is required, but I'm not going to be able to analyse them properly myself. I should have a bit more time for testing next week and I plan to try setting up the guest with the different virtual network adapters models to see if that helps. Cheers, Kevin. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-testers" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
