On Thu, 2009-02-19 at 21:17 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > Well, harsh or not is not the question here. > > Fact is that you call gettimeofday() _before_ the timekeeping code has > resumed. > > That's a simple ordering problem. timekeeping is in the sysdev class > as well and it's not the only sysdev which has explicit ordering > requirements. And how do I control that ordering ? I find that a bit fishy ... What about making gettimeofday() in the timekeeping code work, just return a frozen snapshot of the value on suspend instead ? Ben. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-testers" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
