Re: [Bug #12650] Strange load average and ksoftirqd behavior with 2.6.29-rc2-git1

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Here the calls to rcu_process_callbacks() are only 75 
> microseconds apart, so that this function is consuming more 
> than 10% of a CPU.  The strange thing is that I don't see a 
> raise_softirq() in between, though perhaps it gets inlined or 
> something that makes it invisible to ftrace.

look at the latest trace please, that has even the most inline 
raise-softirq method instrumented, so all the raising is 
visible.

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-testers" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux