* Matthew Garrett <mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 11:16:47PM +0100, Tino Keitel wrote: > > > I think if it works without DRI in 2.6.27 and doesn't work in 2.6.28, > > it isn't a configuration error, but a real regression. > > It only worked by accident without DRM support, since you were using the > ATI codepath in the firmware rather than the Intel one. That bug's been > fixed, [...] Which precise commit ID is that? > [...] so now you're following the Intel codepath - unfortunately > there's no way to do that without kernel-level graphics support, which > means DRM. Tino, does it all work fine if CONFIG_DRM is enabled? Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-testers" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
