On Sunday 15 February 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Sunday 15 February 2009, Justin Madru wrote: > > > Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > > > > of regressions introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28. > > > > > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > > > introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should > > > > be listed and let me know (either way). > > > > > > > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12263 > > > > Subject : Sata soft reset filling log > > > > Submitter : Justin Madru <bevicm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Date : 2008-12-13 2:07 (64 days old) > > > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122913412608533&w=4 > > > > > > I'm still seeing this on .29-rc5, and I think that my bug #12263 is a > > > duplicate of bug #12609, > > > or more correctly it's a duplicate of mine because I reported first. > > > > > > It seems like the bug has been fixed in tip/master for some time now. > > > Below is the diff of origin and tip from when I tested. > > > > Ingo, do you know whinch patch in -tip fixes this regression? > > This one, done on Jan 10, more than a month ago: > > f1d26da: Revert "libata: Add 32bit PIO support" > > When a commit causes trouble in -tip qa i immediately revert it in 95% > of the cases, no questions asked. Especially if it's related to > persistent storage. OK, thanks. We seem to have a working fix patch for this issue in bug #12609. Best, Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-testers" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
