On Fri, 30 Jan 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Suspend to RAM is reported to break on some machines as a result of > attempting to put one of driverless PCI devices into a low power > state. Avoid that by not attepmting to power manage driverless > devices during suspend. Just out of curiosity, what would happen if one of these troublesome devices _did_ have a driver? Would suspend still be broken? Would you then blame the driver instead of the PCI core? Or would the driver be smart enough to avoid putting the device in a low-power state? But doesn't that defeat the purpose of suspending in the first place? Alan Stern -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-testers" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
