Re: [Bug #12208] uml is very slow on 2.6.28 host

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2008-12-16 at 01:49 +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Dec 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12208
> > Subject		: uml is very slow on 2.6.28 host
> > Submitter	: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Date		: 2008-12-12 9:35 (2 days old)
> > References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122907463518593&w=4
> 
> I did a bisection, and this is the commit which is responsible:
> 
>   commit 464b75273f64be7c81fee975bd6ca9593df3427b
>   Author: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx>
>   Date:   Fri Oct 24 11:06:15 2008 +0200
>   
>       sched: re-instate vruntime based wakeup preemption
>   
>       The advantage is that vruntime based wakeup preemption has a better
>       conceptual model. Here wakeup_gran = 0 means: preempt when 'fair'.
>       Therefore wakeup_gran is the granularity of unfairness we allow in order
>       to make progress.
>   
>       Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx>
>       Acked-by: Mike Galbraith <efault@xxxxxx>
>       Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>

If that commit is responsible, then it should also be very slow in pre
28 kernels, where the same exists.  Hm, there's another possibility.
Can you try echo NO_LAST_BUDDY > /sys/kernel/debug/sched_features?

	-Mike

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-testers" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux