Re: [PATCH 0/6] fs: Scalability of sockets/pipes allocation/deallocation on SMP

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] fs: Scalability of sockets/pipes allocation/deallocation on SMP
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 19:03:18 +0100
Cc: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, kernel-testers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Mike Galbraith <efault@xxxxxx>, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx>, Linux Netdev List <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <492DDB6A.8090806@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0811201727070.9089@xxxxxxxxx> <20081121083044.GL16242@xxxxxxx> <49267694.1030506@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20081121.010508.40225532.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4926AEDB.10007@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4926D022.5060008@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20081121152148.GA20388@xxxxxxx> <4926D39D.9050603@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20081121153453.GA23713@xxxxxxx> <492DDB6A.8090806@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)

* Eric Dumazet <dada1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hi all
>
> Short summary : Nice speedups for allocation/deallocation of sockets/pipes
> (From 27.5 seconds to 1.6 second)

Wow, that's incredibly impressive! :-)

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-testers" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 0/6] fs: Scalability of sockets/pipes allocation/deallocation on SMP
  - From: Peter Zijlstra

References:
- Re: [Bug #11308] tbench regression on each kernel release from 2.6.22 -> 2.6.28
  - From: Christoph Lameter
- Re: [Bug #11308] tbench regression on each kernel release from 2.6.22 -> 2.6.28
  - From: Ingo Molnar
- Re: [Bug #11308] tbench regression on each kernel release from 2.6.22 -> 2.6.28
  - From: Eric Dumazet
- Re: [Bug #11308] tbench regression on each kernel release from 2.6.22 -> 2.6.28
  - From: David Miller
- Re: [Bug #11308] tbench regression on each kernel release from 2.6.22 -> 2.6.28
  - From: Eric Dumazet
- [PATCH] fs: pipe/sockets/anon dentries should not have a parent
  - From: Eric Dumazet
- Re: [PATCH] fs: pipe/sockets/anon dentries should not have a parent
  - From: Ingo Molnar
- Re: [PATCH] fs: pipe/sockets/anon dentries should not have a parent
  - From: Eric Dumazet
- Re: [PATCH] fs: pipe/sockets/anon dentries should not have a parent
  - From: Ingo Molnar
- [PATCH 0/6] fs: Scalability of sockets/pipes allocation/deallocation on SMP
  - From: Eric Dumazet

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 6/6] fs: Introduce kern_mount_special() to mount special vfs
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 0/6] fs: Scalability of sockets/pipes allocation/deallocation on SMP
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/6] fs: Scalability of sockets/pipes allocation/deallocation on SMP
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/6] fs: Scalability of sockets/pipes allocation/deallocation on SMP
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux USB Devel] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite News] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI]