* David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 23:15:50 +0100 > > > Yes, I mentioned it later. But apparently you dont read my mails, > > so I will just stop now. > > Yeah I was going to mention this too :-/ I spent hours profiling the networking code, and no, i didnt read all the incoming emails in parallel - i read them after that. I have established it beyond reasonable doubt that the scheduler is doing the right thing with the config i've posted. Your "wakeup is two orders of magnitude more expensive" claim, which got me to measure and profile this stuff, is not reproducible here and this regression should not be listed as a scheduler regression. Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-testers" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
