On Sunday, 26 of October 2008, Dave Chinner wrote: > On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 10:06:44PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > > of recent regressions. > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > from 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know > > (either way). > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11805 > > Subject : mounting XFS produces a segfault > > Submitter : Tiago Maluta <maluta_tiago@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Date : 2008-10-21 18:00 (5 days old) > > Ah - this was reported as a 2.6.26 -> 2.6.27 regression, not a > .27->.28-rcX regression. > > Even so, it's not obviously an XFS regression as the problem is > that alloc_pages(GFP_KERNEL) is the new failure on .27. The fact > that XFS never handled the allocation failure is not a new bug > or regression - it has never caught failures during log > allocation... > > So really, if you want to look for a regression here, it is the > change of behaviour in the VM leading to a memory allocation failure > where it has never, ever previously failed... OK, I moved it to the list of regressions introduced between .26 and .27. Thanks, Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-testers" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
