On Wednesday 08 October 2008 02:32, Dave Jones wrote: > On Wed, Oct 08, 2008 at 02:18:18AM +1100, Nick Piggin wrote: > > On Sunday 05 October 2008 04:32, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > > > of recent regressions. > > > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > > from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me > > > know (either way). > > > > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11224 > > > Subject : Only three cores found on quad-core machine. > > > Submitter : Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > Date : 2008-08-01 18:15 (65 days old) > > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121761475224719&w=4 > > > > Dave, is your CPU2 getting stuck in calibrate_delay? Can you still > > reproduce the bug? What if you boot the kernel with lpj=<something sane > > like 2666785> in order to skip the calibrate_delay code? > > > > If that helps, can you try adding some printks to narrow down where it > > is getting stuck? > > This is going to sound strange, but I've forgotten which box that was. > I'm due to reinstall all my test boxes now that the next Fedora beta > has come out anyway, so I'll hopefully figure out by the end of the week :) That does sound strange ;) But I can't believe that! It would be really interesting if it was stuck in calibrate_delay, but maybe the backtrace is just messed up... If you do manage to reproduce it, I would be quite interested. Otherwise, I think we can say it's not a showstopper for 2.6.27. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-testers" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
