Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote: >> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11308 >> > Subject : tbench regression on each kernel release from 2.6.22 -> 2.6.28 >> > Submitter : Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> > Date : 2008-08-11 18:36 (55 days old) >> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121847986119495&w=4 >> > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122125737421332&w=4 >> >> Just for the reference, this one regresses from the 2.6.23. > > Still, tbench results from 2.6.26 are better than from 2.6.27-rc. > That's why it's still on the list, but if you think that's not relevant, please > let me know and I'll drop it. Note that 2.6.27 beats 2.6.26 by 30% with bulk traffic over loopback as opposed to the small packets sent by tbench where I saw a 5% drop in performance on my machine. So I'm not sure whether this should really be classified as a regression if we limit ourselves to the changes between 26 and 27. The changes prior to 26 seem to be more significant. Chyeers, -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-testers" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
