On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 12:29 AM, Jiri Kosina <jkosina@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, 22 Sep 2008, David Miller wrote: > >> So I went through the changes from 2.6.27-rc5 until the SHA1 >> ID ec0c15afb41fd9ad45b53468b60db50170e22346 and there were >> definitely no E1000 or E1000E changes during that time. > > Some recent comments on [1] seem to indicate that this is somehow coupled > into prior problems/panics with Intel graphics. > > David, was this also your case, or did the EEPROM got garbled out of a > sudden? I have no evidence in my logs of a graphics panic, but I do do a lot of graphics devel, so it might be a possiblity but I'd hate to handwave it away at that. Dave. > > [1] https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425480 > > -- > Jiri Kosina > SUSE Labs > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-testers" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
