> > Sorry if I am interfering... just wanted to inject this data, in case > > it's meaningful! > > Yeah, nothing has changed yet for your case. What should change your case > is the thing Yinghai is working on with the "late add of e820 data to the > resource tree". OK. > His earlier version already worked for you, didn't it? We're really now > just finalizing details (in fact, "insert_resource_expand_to_fit()" is > just a helper function for a detail that may not even matter all that > much). Yes, it worked fine! :D BTW, there was an individual who reported a regression back in May on the very same commit. I was not able to get him to participate in the process of tracking this down, but he did (suddenly) write a post on his blog a couple of days ago that he had success using some unspecified git tree HEAD. I believe that was probably the patch that you have reverted, so once I know that a new candidate is in place I will let him know on his blog and see if I can talk him into trying it. This has been a month-long quest for me -- beginning on Aug. 4 -- and I can understand why he gave up in May without resolving the issue. It's too bad for all of us that he didn't pursue it then, huh? Thanks, Dave W. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-testers" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
