On Wednesday, 25 of June 2008, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, Hi, > Changes since next-20080624: > > The tip-core tree gained three conflicts against Linus' tree. > > The sched tree gained a conflict against the cpus4096 tree. > > The x86 tree gained a conflict against the ftrace tree. It also required > three patches that Ingo supplied. > > The pci tree gained two conflicts against the x86 tree. > > The v4l-dvb tree has had another commit reverted for a build problem, > however that may have been due to a mismerge in yesterday's tree. > > The acpi tree gained two conflicts against the x86 tree. > > The tests tree gained a conflict against the sched tree. > > The vfs tree gained a conflict against the sched tree. > > The rr tree gained a conflict against each of the sched and powerpc > trees. It also required a patch and a commit reverted for build problems. > > The pcmcia tree lost its conflict against Linus' tree. This tree is completely broken on my test box (x86-64 HP nx6325) and I can't even bisect it. :-( It hits a NULL pointer dereference in find_symbol during boot, but when I tried to bisect this issue, I hit another one that made the box hang solid during boot (early, no messages available). If things continue going this way, 2.6.27 will be a disaster ... Thanks, Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-testers" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
