Re: [PATCH] clk: ti: use kcalloc() instead of kzalloc()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: ti: use kcalloc() instead of kzalloc()
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2025 15:49:15 -0800
Cc: mturquette@xxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-clk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-hardening@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, kernel-hardening@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: mailing list kernel-hardening@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: moderator for kernel-hardening@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <xfjn4wqrhukvi45dkgkbulamq3242eijn7567vxwaxznh4ebdr@waat7u3l2mhi>
Mailing-list: contact kernel-hardening-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
User-agent: alot/0.12.dev1+gaa8c22fdeedb

Quoting Ethan Carter Edwards (2024-12-29 21:28:58)
> Use 2-factor multiplication argument form kcalloc() instead
> of kzalloc().
> 
> Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/162
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ethan Carter Edwards <ethan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---

Applied to clk-next

References:
- [PATCH] clk: ti: use kcalloc() instead of kzalloc()
  - From: Ethan Carter Edwards

Prev by Date: [PATCH] clk: ti: use kcalloc() instead of kzalloc()
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v23 7/8] samples/check-exec: Add an enlighten "inc" interpreter and 28 tests
Previous by thread: [PATCH] clk: ti: use kcalloc() instead of kzalloc()
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Samsung SoC] [Linux Rockchip SoC] [Linux Actions SoC] [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors] [Linux NFS] [Linux NILFS] [Linux USB Devel] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite News] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux