Re: [PATCH v21 6/6] samples/check-exec: Add an enlighten "inc" interpreter and 28 tests

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Nov 26, 2024 at 12:41:45PM -0500, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> On Fri, 2024-11-22 at 15:50 +0100, Mickaël Salaün wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 21, 2024 at 03:34:47PM -0500, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> > > Hi Mickaël,
> > > 
> > > On Tue, 2024-11-12 at 20:18 +0100, Mickaël Salaün wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > +
> > > > +/* Returns 1 on error, 0 otherwise. */
> > > > +static int interpret_stream(FILE *script, char *const script_name,
> > > > +			    char *const *const envp, const bool restrict_stream)
> > > > +{
> > > > +	int err;
> > > > +	char *const script_argv[] = { script_name, NULL };
> > > > +	char buf[128] = {};
> > > > +	size_t buf_size = sizeof(buf);
> > > > +
> > > > +	/*
> > > > +	 * We pass a valid argv and envp to the kernel to emulate a native
> > > > +	 * script execution.  We must use the script file descriptor instead of
> > > > +	 * the script path name to avoid race conditions.
> > > > +	 */
> > > > +	err = execveat(fileno(script), "", script_argv, envp,
> > > > +		       AT_EMPTY_PATH | AT_EXECVE_CHECK);
> > > 
> > > At least with v20, the AT_CHECK always was being set, independent of whether
> > > set-exec.c set it.  I'll re-test with v21.
> > 
> > AT_EXECVE_CEHCK should always be set, only the interpretation of the
> > result should be relative to securebits.  This is highlighted in the
> > documentation.
> 
> Sure, that sounds correct.  With an IMA-appraisal policy, any unsigned script
> with the is_check flag set now emits an "cause=IMA-signature-required" audit
> message.  However since IMA-appraisal isn't enforcing file signatures, this
> sounds wrong.
> 
> New audit messages like "IMA-signature-required-by-interpreter" and "IMA-
> signature-not-required-by-interpreter" would need to be defined based on the
> SECBIT_EXEC_RESTRICT_FILE.

It makes sense.  Could you please send a patch for these
IMA-*-interpreter changes?  I'll include it in the next series.

> 
> 
> > > 
> > > > +	if (err && restrict_stream) {
> > > > +		perror("ERROR: Script execution check");
> > > > +		return 1;
> > > > +	}
> > > > +
> > > > +	/* Reads script. */
> > > > +	buf_size = fread(buf, 1, buf_size - 1, script);
> > > > +	return interpret_buffer(buf, buf_size);
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> 
> 



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux