Re: [PATCH v3 0/1] Restrict access to TIOCLINUX

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 03:00:19PM +0200, Günther Noack wrote:
> Let me update the list of known usages then: The TIOCL_SETSEL, TIOCL_PASTESEL
> and TIOCL_SELLOADLUT mentions found on codesearch.debian.net are:
> 
> (1) Actual invocations:
> 
>  * consolation:
>      "consolation" is a gpm clone, which also runs as root.
>      (I have not had the chance to test this one yet.)

I have tested the consolation program with a kernel that has the patch, and it
works as expected -- you can copy and paste on the console.


>  * BRLTTY:
>      Uses TIOCL_SETSEL as a means to highlight portions of the screen.
>      The TIOCSTI patch made BRLTTY work by requiring CAP_SYS_ADMIN,
>      so we know that BRLTTY has that capability (it runs as root and
>      does not drop it).
> 
> (2) Some irrelevant matches:
> 
>  * snapd: has a unit test mentioning it, to test their seccomp filters
>  * libexplain: mentions it, but does not call it (it's a library for
>    human-readably decoding system calls)
>  * manpages: documentation
> 
> 
> *Outside* of codesearch.debian.org:
> 
>  * gpm:
>      I've verified that this works with the patch.
>      (To my surprise, Debian does not index this project's code.)

(As Samuel pointed out, I was wrong there - Debian does index it, but it does
not use the #defines from the headers... who would have thought...)


> FWIW, I also briefly looked into "jamd" (https://jamd.sourceforge.net/), which
> was mentioned as similar in the manpage for "consolation", but that software
> does not use any ioctls at all.
> 
> So overall, it still seems like nothing should break. 👍

Summarizing the above - the only three programs which are known to use the
affected TIOCLINUX subcommands are:

* consolation (tested)
* gpm (tested)
* BRLTTY (known to work with TIOCSTI, where the same CAP_SYS_ADMIN requirement
  is imposed for a while now)

I think that this is a safe change for the existing usages and that we have done
the due diligence required to turn off these features.

Greg, could you please have another look?

Thanks,
—Günther

-- 
Sent using Mutt 🐕 Woof Woof




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux