On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 12:22:16PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 01:23:41AM +0200, Jann Horn wrote: > > > It would probably be good to keep LTO and non-LTO builds in sync about > > which files are subjected to objtool checks. So either you should be > > removing the OBJECT_FILES_NON_STANDARD annotations for anything that > > is linked into the main kernel (which would be a nice cleanup, if that > > is possible), > > This, I've had to do that for a number of files already for the limited > vmlinux.o passes we needed for noinstr validation. Getting rid of OBJECT_FILES_NON_STANDARD is indeed the end goal, though I'm not sure how practical that will be for some of the weirder edge case. On a related note, I have some old crypto cleanups which need dusting off. -- Josh
