On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 03:05:18PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote: > On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 08:40:06PM +0200, John Wood wrote: > > > To jump on the bikeshed: how about just calling this > > > FORK_BRUTE_FORCE_DETECTION or FORK_BRUTE, and the directory could be > > > "brute", etc. "fbfam" doesn't tell anyone anything. > > > > Understood. But how about use the fbfam abbreviation in the code? Like as > > function name prefix, struct name prefix, ... It would be better to use a > > more descriptive name in this scenario? It is not clear to me. > > I don't feel too strongly, but I think having the CONFIG roughly match > the directory name, roughly match the function prefixes should be best. > Maybe call the directory and function prefix "brute"? Thanks for the clarification. > -- > Kees Cook Regards, John Wood
