Re: [PATCH v19 09/12] arch: Wire up landlock() syscall

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 9:31 AM Mickaël Salaün <mic@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 08/07/2020 09:22, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 7, 2020 at 8:10 PM Mickaël Salaün <mic@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >> index f4a01305d9a6..a63a411a74d5 100644
> >> --- a/include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h
> >> +++ b/include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h
>
> OK, I'll rebase the next series on linux-next.

Just change the number to the next free one, without actually rebasing.
It's always a bit messy to have multiple syscalls added, but I think that
causes the least confusion.

> Do you know if there is other syscalls on their way to linux-next?

None that I'm aware of.

> Are the other parts of arch/syscall OK for you?

The arch/* and include/uapi/asm-generic changes look ok to me.
I'll reply to the syscall implementation separately/

     Arnd




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux